'There is, it seems, more concern about whether children learn the mechanics of reading and writing than grow to love reading and writing; learn about democracy than have practice in democracy; hear about knowledge... rather than gain experience in personally constructing knowledge... see the world narrowly, simple and ordered, rather than broad complex and uncertain'. Vitto Perrone, 'Letter to Teachers'

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Cycle Four: How Should Curriculum Be Generated?


Cycle Four: How Should Curriculum Be Generated?

            Generating, creating, and revising curriculum can be a daunting task.  There are many factors to consider such as what backgrounds are associated with your students, the level of understanding the teachers have of the objectives, and the many decisions associated with the organization of the curriculum.  It is a necessary evil, as without a quality curriculum, the students will surely fall behind.
            I must begin by saying that underlying agendas should not be part of developing a curriculum.  It should never be about the agenda of the adults, but about the students themselves.  Private agendas such as the recent topic in Texas dealing with religious viewpoints should be saved for church and home environments, not public schools.  When I say this I am not stating that religion should not be taught.  I believe public schools should teach all religion and in an appropriate manner.  This would entail not leaving certain information out or only focusing on certain people in history.  One of my favorite high school classes was Global Studies because we learned about religions I had never heard before and what their practices were.  I went from only knowing one way of life, to understanding and discovering what else is out there and could embrace the diversity of religion.
            To restate the question at hand, we are studying how curriculum should be generated.  I believe it is important to take into consideration your students, their home lives, backgrounds, and interests.  Surveys should be sent to families and teachers should survey their students at the beginning of each year.  Yes there are core objectives to be taught, but you can teach an objective in many ways.  One example is how I taught mean, median, mode, and range this week.  I have an athletic class who thrives on sports and competition.  I timed 15 students in the hallway for how fast they could run from one door to the other.  We then calculated the mean, median, mode, and range for the set of data collected.  The objective was to calculate the mean, median, mode, and range of a set of data.  My students were able to do this after not only competing with one another, but also running in the hallway.  You can imagine the excitement.  Next year, I could have kids who hate running and therefore would pull another bag of tricks out of my teacher hat.  The point being, pay attention to the students and what will stimulate and engage them in order to provide learning experiences with the desired outcome.
            When it comes to curriculum, how it is organized is high important.  I believe the vertical and horizontal relations are important.  Each year should go into more depth of the previous year.  This year 4th grade learned how to identify, add, subtract, and multiply fractions.  Next year they will divide fractions, begin working with mixed numbers, etc.  The next year they will incorporate fractions with algebra concepts.  It is taking a concept and going into more depth, which will deepen their understanding.  Horizontal relations are of equal value.  Last week the students were studying vocabulary terms from a government unit in Social Studies.  The term discussed was treason.  I explained what it meant and provided examples, but yesterday while reading a story about Nazis and the Holocaust they read an actual example of what treason was involving Adolf Hitler.  It was like 27 light bulbs going off in the classroom.  Not only were they excited that one subject had to do with the other, but they translated that term from one thing and deepened the understanding of it in another.  Curriculum must also be reiterated throughout the year.  If you teach one topic in November and never refer to it again, how can you expect students to remember it?  This leads into another concept for curriculum known as workshop.  I believe math, reading, and language arts in elementary schools should have scheduled workshop where the students are independently working with multiple forms of material such as manipulatives, pencil paper, etc.  This should give them that time to apply what they have learned from a previous lesson.  During this time the teacher should also be working with small groups on areas they have not reached mastery on.  This will help maximize learning because students are getting more one on one attention as well as having continuity of concepts.  You can have your students practice long division, which they may have learned 3 months ago, but they are getting continued practice with it.
            Another important concept in generating curriculum is how to evaluate what has been retained.  When it comes to the year as a whole.  Students should be evaluated at the beginning, middle, and end.  They should be evaluated on each subject area.  The North Western  Education Assessment program which my school calls NWEA test is helpful in this component.  It tests students in the fall, winter, and spring.  I am given data for Math, Reading, and Language Arts and Science.  Unfortunately it does not assess Social Studies.  The data I am given helps me see what areas my students need help on in each subject which are broken into dmaller categories.  Math is broken into Measurement, Geometry, Data and Probability, Numbers and Operations, and Algebra.  I can then find what objectives in those categories to work on with my students.  The students are given scores after being tested and receive goals to reach by the end of the year. They are given incentives for reaching their goals.  I know there are flaws as this is only one kind of appraisal and it is all computer.  You have students whom are poor test takers and other factors, but I do think it is good that it tests them and allows the teacher to gage where his/her students are at throughout the year.  As far as evaluating the lower levels of organization such as units, pre assessments should be made, formative assessments should also be done throughout the daily lessons in the unit, and then a final assessment should be made.  You should always know where your students are.  If 80 percent of students have reached mastery then the teacher can move on, however if it is less than 80 percent I believe re-teaching must occur.  These are all imperative points of evaluation.
            Who should be involved in all of this?  Everyone!  If 4th grade teachers have no clue of what 3rd grade teachers are doing then we have a major disconnect.  You can’t build deeper connections if you don’t know what the prior grade has done.  I also couldn’t agree more with the point that was made regarding how teachers all need to be on board when it comes to clearly defining the objectives and how they are to be expressed and evaluated.  It cannot be about me it has to be about we.  For the students are everyone’s responsibility from kindergarten until 12th grade.



Sources


This article discusses ways of engaging students and the importance of this in curriculum.  This goes along with the theories of the second reading we did where the author discusses how important it is for students to be involved and engaged in learning experiences.


This article discusses a school that is in need of redeveloping their curriculum to align with state standards.  In relation to this cycle, it deals with the fact that teachers need to teach the actual objectives and have an understanding of the objectives.  To often do teachers find lessons that seem interesting, but have no tie in with objectives/standards needing to be taught.


This blog was found on Education Week.  I found it interesting in it’s relation to my post as well as our reading in that it emphasizes the importance of developing highly qualified standards in which are engaging.  One form of engagement mentioned was to use primary source documents.  This, to me, engages students because it gives a visual as to a glimpse at history in various times.  I have seen this in Michigan standards and am glad it is being used.


In my blog I mentioned the use of the NWEA test at my school.  There are many useful pieces of information to get a better understanding of what this assessment program is.  I have found it helpful for me but please keep in mind I am not a fan of only using a standardized test to gage students academic success.


I referred to having workshops in class daily.  This website is useful for implementing writing and reading workshops in the classroom.  It provides ideas, duration, and many other useful tips.  I recommend it!